NEWPORT BOROUGH COUNCIL...ARE FUCKING CRAP

Ok heres the score on this. My poll tax, sorry community charge has been going up and up year after year. Now where does this money go? Not on rubbish collection thats for damn sure. When I moved into my house about 2 years ago now, the bins were collected every week and that was that. Put the bin out on the way to work, and when I got back it was done.

Now the system is royally fucked to be fair. Its gone from once a week, to once every two weeks. Never mind the fact that by that point half the bins in the street are overflowing onto the floor.

Then as if that were not enough, if something does drop outside the bin does it get moved, does it hell. So you got to put that back in and hopefully it shall vanish in 2 weeks time.

Now aside from this Newport Borough Council decides that we are all going green, and shall all be helping to save the planet and all that. So we have 2 recycling boxes one for paper and the other for bottles and the like.

All sounds wonderfull until I explain that the recycling people are a bunch of lazy arsed fucktards that cant be bothered to pick up half the boxes in the street. I kid you not I have seen on many an occasion half the street done, and the rest left. Is it that difficult to get another wagon out if the first is full?

If you make a mistake and mix some stuff up, its a case of fuck you. Your box or boxes get left. I think its a case of tough love, in that if someone puts paper in the bottle box and vice versa they have to swap it over themselves.

An you got to sort that all out and they will pick it up in 2 weeks. Also they are fussy over what they define as "paper" or "cans/bottles" and will leave anything that they dont like the look off. Classic comment from a collector "Nah cant take pizza boxes mate, they aint proper paper?"...Yeah you work that out.

I love the way I now pay more for rubbish collection and have a far poorer service as a result. Down from weekly to fortnightly. Also this is the best part, if you try to complain to the council, guess what? They dont reply to e-mails. Yep, they have an e-mail system that classes all complaints as junk and files them straight into the rycycling bin, and I bet they empty that more than once every two weeks.

As for the MP's well they are of little use: Paul Flynn is busy trying to legalise dope(something he has been trying to get done for 20 years or so and so has little interest in the bins) and the other is a do nothing all wimmin selected bint who scraped in on a wing and a prayer.

And so I deliver my message to Newport Borough Councils "occasional" rubbish collection system.

My MP the libelist - his libel apology:
Recently Paul Flynn was involved in a libel case where he made comments about an endowment pensions company, the result of which he had to pay out damages. He was sued after he posted an attack on such companies on his website, claiming they were out to "re-rob" the victims of endowment mis-selling by dishonestly over-charging them for their services.

But he made the mistake of referring to well-regarded company Endowment Justice Ltd, which represents mis-selling victims on a "no-win, no-fee" basis. The company and its directors sued and at London's High Court Mr Flynn made a public apology for the "unjustified attack" on the claimants' integrity.

The MP as part of the settlement put the following statement on his website: On this website in February this year, I made certain statements referring to Endowment Justice Limited, one of the companies which offers assistance in obtaining compensation for those people who were mis-sold endowment policies. I have been campaigning against companies providing professional services in relation to endowment policy compensation claims, but my facts about Endowment Justice were incorrect. As a result, I wrongly accused the company and its directors Nick Keca, Marianne Fitzjohn and Graeme Webber of having previously mis-sold endowment policies and now dishonestly overcharging those self-same victims to help them obtain compensation. I am happy to clarify that neither Endowment Justice Ltd or any of its directors were ever involved in any aspect of endowment policy selling. It was therefore false and unfair to suggest that they had profited from the historic mis-selling of endowment policies. I was also incorrect in stating that Endowment Justice, which offers its services in recovering compensation on a “no-win, no-fee” basis, could charge its customers up to 40% of any compensation gained. Endowment Justice in fact charge customers 17.5% plus VAT or 22.5% plus VAT of any compensation gained. I was wrong to give the unintended impression that the company or its directors acts in any way improperly or unlawfully in providing services to those seeking compensation for endowment policy mis-selling. I would like to apologise to Endowment Justice for my allegations, and to Mr. Keca, Ms. Fitzjohn and Mr. Webber for any embarrassment or distress caused by my false remarks.

.