One that is sure to scare the children and stick them in debt for years and years to come....
.

This fiasco with pirates has dragged on for ages, hopefully this couple will be freed without harm and I hope without any ransom being paid as that will just encourage further acts of piracy.He went to Pergamon, took the pirates out of prison and crucified the lot of them, just as he had often told them he would do when he was on the island and they imagined that he was joking.There you go, nail the fuckers up. Simples.
"For children under 12 who cannot make the distinction between fantasy and reality, we need tough regulation," Mrs Hodge said. Under the current rules, the BBFC's legally-enforceable age limits only have to applied to games containing violent or sexual content.Mrs Hodge also revealed that ministers are looking closely at online games amid growing concerns at Westminster about their use.
Multi-user internet-based games such as World of warcraft and Everquest allow players to share a virtual world with thousands of other people from around the world. The growing popularity of such games has sparked calls for new regulation.Yes, an why oh why are the government sticking their socialist oar into online gaming?
The Culture Committee of MPs this week raised fears that paedophiles are making growing use of virtual worlds for activities including simulated sex with children. Mrs Hodge told BBC Radio Four that the growing popularity of online games required new rules.Ah right the 21st Century bogeyman, the paedophile.
In 2003 she was involved in a controversy about press coverage of a man [Demetrious Panton] who accused her of being ultimately responsible for abuse he suffered as a child in a home overseen by Mrs Hodge as leader of Islington Council. Following a media campaign conducted by several national newspapers calling for her to resign, she was further drawn into the controversy by responding to the man in question by letter and referring to him in it as 'extremely disturbed'.Best and by best I mean worst part of this is that, Labour appointed her Minister for Children.
Sir Christopher Kelly's revised expenses rules will be accepted by the House of Commons. Members of parliament who wish to retain their seats – and the party leaders who compete with them for the title of Purest of Them All – have no choice but to kiss the lash. The mood of the country allows nothing else. It is the price that the honest and hard-working majority have to pay for the excesses of their colleagues who exploited the system in a way which was part scandal and part farce.Hard working? Oh come on MP's do not know the meaning of the word. Extra time off this year at Christmas, a huge break in the middle of the year. Even the PM has been caught with his snot covered fingers in the public's back pocket helping himself.
But that does not require the pretence that all the new proposals are either right or reasonable. They are a response to the populist clamour that the exposure of previous excesses – right and necessary though it was – created.Indeed the new proposals are not right, they do not go far enough. That an MP can get expenses on mortgage interest and help build themselves a property portfolio at our expense is wrong.
Some of Kelly's recommendations have intrinsic merit. It is clearly wrong for a member of parliament to acquire a second property with a mortgage subsidised by the taxpayer. The prohibition of that practice confirms the arbitrary nature of rules which govern Sir Thomas Legg's retrospective revision of what it was acceptable for MPs to charge in previous years.Glad you agree, also house flipping and lying ones arse off about where one lives like fat arsed kebeb muncher and expenses poster girl Jacqui Smith is also wrong.
David Cameron received £1,750 a month to defray the interest on the house he bought in his constituency – the bigger the house, the bigger the mortgage and the bigger the taxpayers' subsidy. Sir Thomas requires that only £237 in total be repaid. Who can object that, in future, Mr Cameron will have to make do with his own resources? However, some of Kelly's proposals are less easy to justify.I note he picks Cameron, got to get the Tory jibe in there has Roy. Still almost every one of the fuckers in The House is bleeding us white.
During my 30 years in the Commons – when expenses increased from literally nothing to inadequate secretarial and constituency accommodation allowances – I never even considered employing a member of my family. Nor did any of my close friends. But to prohibit the practice is absurd.Yes, I am sure that MP's will not be happy that they can not claim all the wifes wages back off the taxpayer. An so he go's on an on an fucking on.
No doubt we will now have a trade your dog in scheme announced by HM Govt, along with a subsidy on buying a new eco friendly mutt.Any evidence of MI5 and MI6 involvement in the rendition and torture of Britons now seeking damages must be heard behind closed doors, the government told the high court today.
In a move with profound implications for how the security and intelligence agencies can be held to account, ministers want the evidence to be withheld from the victims of illegal activities and their lawyers.Blah blah blah. As Labour ministers say whenever they want to get draconian on us: nothing to fear, nothing to hide....
“In many cases, customers are put off going to pubs in town centres, for example, because of the violence that takes place”.So is Gerry admitting there, that despite rehabilitation in the penal system by giving lags their own keys, that town and city centres have become no-go areas?
“Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world’s resources. A vegetarian diet is better."Blah blah blah. Harden the fuck up Stern.
This time the Sunday Mail saw fit to lift part of my 'Blatant racism at the BBC' post and insert it into this article.
It must be very simple to be a tabloid journalist these days. The wonder of google makes the cobbling together of stories easy and quick.
However, I would like to point out this and in particular the following part,
Non-Commercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Yes, I know that in legal terms it really means nothing. But here in the blogosphere we have a few unwritten rules/understandings. Any blogger can lift anything from any other site and use it provided an acknowledgement is used.
The fact that a newspaper lifted and printed my words, to help it make money, sticks in my throat a bit. Even an E mail from them beforehand would have been nice and I probably wouldn't have bothered provided it was used within context.
A gambler thought he had won £170,000 on a flutter on the horses – until he realised he had forgotten to actually make the bet.
The 48-year-old hotelier celebrated in his local bookies as his first horse, Tres Amigos, passed the winning post.
Man, that has got to be a pisser.But then confused BetFred manager Darren Baxter asked why he was so happy and Mr Harper found the slip in his pocket and had to watch as every horse he had bet on came in.
Another protester, an IT manager who only wants to be known as John for fear of police retribution, said he was stopped more than 25 times in two and half years after a “protester” marker was placed against his Mercedes SUV.
He said police were giving him inconsistent explanations for the stops.Now far be from me to work out or question the police reasoning and logic for this, but he hardly seems like a threat to the state. He objects to shooting and go's about his lawful business in expressing his displeasure, no laws as far as I can see have been broken.
“I heard every excuse under the sun: ‘We’ve heard reports of suspicious vehicles in the area’ or ‘We’re keeping an eye on high value vehicles moving through the area,’” he said. “One or two officers would be a bit more honest and say: ‘Your number plate has flagged up on our system, we don’t know why.’ This was happening all over the country.”
He finally decided to complain after a police armed response unit stopped him during an evening out with his wife in March 2008.
Documents revealed a marker “requiring stop checks” had been placed on his car by Lancashire police in 2006 after he attended a protest, described by the local paper as “peaceful”, against duck and pheasant shoot near Preston.
He once told a parliamentary committee that the most dangerous drivers were "serial potential killers" and said he was "shocked" at the leniency of sentences handed down to them.He received only a fine, so another "serial potential killer" back at work in the House of Commons.
He is the Cabinet enforcer who demands his espresso at 3pm on the dot and orders his officials to speak in plain English just as they would 'in the pub'.
The 2011 survey will demand to know how many bedrooms there are in homes and detailed information about any 'overnight visitors'.
Apparently the expenses fiddling MP for Cardiff celebrated his 50th birthday the other day, so having been informed of that fact via my local MP's webshyte; I thought it was time to take another look at Brennon."What will Peter Davies do next to embarrass the city? In everyway, he is beyond a joke."WTF? Paul Flynn calling anyone, an I mean anyone a joke is a serious jaw dropping statement.
The wives, husbands and other family members currently employed at the tax-payers' expense plan to apply for jobs with other MPs as a way of dodging the guidelines expected to be recommended by Sir Christopher Kelly next month.
Sir Christopher, the chairman of the committee on standards in public life, has been tasked with drawing up tough new rules to stop MPs abusing their allowances and expenses after the Daily Telegraph exposed widespread wrong-doing earlier this year.Scum, pure filth each and every one of them.
Powered by
Theme oriental by
FIFA.
Distributed by Blogger Templates | Wordpress Themes