Paul Flynn MP: "Entirely in the right" re libel!!!!

Paul Flynn talks about Ian Lucas and the allegations made by the BBC, he also states this:

Having had some experience of how messy libel suits are, even when you are entirely in the right, I can understand Ian’s reluctance to sue. I urged him to do so at the time but he was well aware of the pitfalls.

Got that Mr Flynn says that - or puts across that he was in the right with his legal fun and games with regards Endowment Justice Limited, a company that sued him for libel. I can also understand Mr Lucas being wary of sueing, especially after being advised by a man who lost his case hands down as his apology shows.

His apology, the bits highlighted are to show where Mr Flynn states in his apology that he is "entirely in the right"

On this website in February this year, I made certain statements referring to Endowment Justice Limited, one of the companies which offers assistance in obtaining compensation for those people who were mis-sold endowment policies. I have been campaigning against companies providing professional services in relation to endowment policy compensation claims, but my facts about Endowment Justice were incorrect. As a result, I wrongly accused the company and its directors Nick Keca, Marianne Fitzjohn and Graeme Webber of having previously mis-sold endowment policies and now dishonestly overcharging those self-same victims to help them obtain compensation.

I am happy to clarify that neither Endowment Justice Ltd or any of its directors were ever involved in any aspect of endowment policy selling. It was therefore false and unfair to suggest that they had profited from the historic mis-selling of endowment policies. I was also incorrect in stating that Endowment Justice, which offers its services in recovering compensation on a “no-win, no-fee” basis, could charge its customers up to 40% of any compensation gained.

Endowment Justice in fact charge customers 17.5% plus VAT or 22.5% plus VAT of any compensation gained. I was wrong to give the unintended impression that the company or its directors acts in any way improperly or unlawfully in providing services to those seeking compensation for endowment policy mis-selling. I would like to apologise to Endowment Justice for my allegations, and to Mr. Keca, Ms. Fitzjohn and Mr. Webber for any embarrassment or distress caused by my false remarks.

As we can see from the apology that has mysteriously vanished from the liars website?! That he is not "entirely in the right" as his apology shows.

I shall now retire to gloat.

.