The National Debt Clock.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Free Speech - Not for Susanne Winter: Mohammed was a paedophile.

Not for Susanne Winter who has been found guilt by a Sharia type dhimmi court of being an apostate.

Vienna - Austrian far-right parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted Thursday of incitement because of her anti-Muslim statements, including the claim that Islam's prophet Mohammed was a paedophile. 

A court in Winter's home town of Graz also found the 51-year-old politician guilty of humiliating a religion. She was sentenced to a fine of 24,000 euros (31,000 dollars) euros and a suspended prison term of three months, Austrian news agency APA reported.

The politician, who took a seat in parliament last fall for the Freedom Party (FPOe), made the anti-Islamic remarks in January 2008.

She also proposed in a discussion with students that Muslim men should commit bestiality rather than making "indecent advances" on girls.

The politician had pleaded innocent Thursday, claiming that she "did not want to insult anyone, but only to point out problems." - The verdict is not yet legally binding.

Now religious arguments aside here, lets have a look at what the moslems holy book actually has to say on this: 

Narrated 'Ursa:

The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).

Now that sounds very much like the sort of behaviour that gets one a term in jail and being put on the sex offenders register, in a word a pedophile.

There is a difference in the willingness of courts in dhimmi states in Europe - or should that be Eurarabia? - with tackling religious offence.

 had this to say: 
However, Alfred Hrdlicka, the Austrian “artist” who depicted Jesus and his apostles engaging in homosexual acts of sodomy during the Last Supper, has not been indicted. Nor will he be. Depicting Jesus sodomizing his apostles is not considered to be a “degradation of religious symbols” in Austria, but referring to the historic fact that Muhammad married a six-year old girl is “incitement to racial hatred.”
Thats strange? Okay to offend Christians, but best not state what moslems have written down in the Koran as a fact?

And so over to Pat for a bit on politcal correctness, or "taking the piss" as we Brits call it.


2 people have spoken:

All Seeing Eye said...

TheEye counts a few lawyers (despite their profession) as friends and when over lunch I posed a hypothetical question along these lines recently one said to me that he would be forced to use a religious argument to defend a Muslim against a charge of kiddy-fiddling if the client wanted that defence....

...and would have a decent case.

Fidothedog said...

Don't surprise me as I think the average lawyer could argue black was white.

Still don't make it so an Mo was a kiddie fiddler, bandit, terrorist and rapist animal abuser.