it was "not acceptable" an animal had been killed as part of a performance.Its a rat, not a sodding polar bear, panda or some sodding endangered species of cute animal or even a husky desperate to be hugged by David Cameron.
What's the difference between that an any other animal killed for food? I am sure over the years of eating dubious curries and kebabs from dubious late night food emporiums; that many a rodent has been unknowingly eaten by myself.
.
2 people have spoken:
Heard about that on the radio, glad I don't watch telly.
Some Aussie apologist guilt monger saying that it would have been ok to kill the rat if it had been the only source of food, but not for 'entertainment'. Still, at least it might mean the demise of all those terrible cookery programmes.
What gets me is this is Australia, I thought they were hard as fuck, suck it up an show no pain types.
Not soft as fuck, hug a rodent types.
Post a Comment