BNP Trial

I have been meaning to do a bit on some of the two big trials that are filling the UK media at the moment, well aside from when Mr Tiddles(Gorge Galloway) is not making an even bigger prick of himself on Celeb Big Brother.

The first of these is that of Abu Hamza, known to the fleet street papers as Capt. Hook due to him not having any hands. Hamza has been ranting for years about jews, kafir and the evils of the western world. Yet strangely he is happy enough to be given a house and benefits by this nation which he has described as like "living in a toilet"

And at the same time we have the trial of two members of the BNP:

The leader of the British National Party (BNP) predicted that Muslim extremists would attack a British city in a speech made 14 months before the July 7 London bombings, a court was told yesterday. Nick Griffin told a BNP rally in May 2004 that “sooner or later there’s going to be Islamic terrorists letting off bombs in major cities”. He said that the perpetrators would be “asylum-seekers or second-generation Pakistanis living in somewhere like Bradford”. ** Well they got that right.

Mr Griffin, 45, and Mark Collett, 24, a senior BNP member, are on trial at Leeds Crown Court accused of conduct intended or likely to stir up racial hatred. The charges are linked to speeches that the two men gave in West Yorkshire between January and May 2004 and which were secretly recorded by an undercover BBC journalist.

Footage of a speech made by Mr Griffin at Morley Town Hall, Leeds, was played to the jury yesterday. In it, standing on a stage before a desk draped with the Union Jack, the BNP chairman was greeted with applause and cheers. He attacked the three main political parties, the police and the press, claiming that they were all part of a conspiracy to cover up the murder of whites by Asians. Mr Griffin contrasted the extensive coverage given to the fatal stabbing of Stephen Lawrence, a black teenager, with the alleged silence over “the forgotten white victims” of racist murders. He listed incidents in Oldham, Colne, near Burnley, Manchester, Glasgow and Sunderland, where he claimed that “young Asians of the Muslim persuasion” had escaped justice after murdering white people. “They’re free, they’re laughing and joking and telling their mates that you can kill a white boy and the papers won’t talk about it, the police won’t do anything about it, the courts won’t convict you.”

Mr Griffin said the Establishment knew that the country was “a tinderbox” but were “hoping against hope that if they shut up about it it will go away”. The mainstream parties, he said, could either “allow us to express the anger and the concern and the fear of the British people”, or they could “try and bottle it all up so it all bloody well goes bang”, in which case “there is going to be blood all over our streets”.

Later in the speech, Mr Griffin appeared to predict his own arrest and trial. “They will take our national and our local leadership and they will throw us into prison on the pretext that, ‘We’re having to arrest radical Muslims who are blowing things up, and if we only arrest them it’s going to upset their community and further radicalise their youth. So we’ve got to show we’re even-handed, so while we’re arresting Islamic terrorist bombers we’ll also arrest elected councillors of the British National Party’. ” Also shown was a filmed speech by Mr Collett, at a Keighley pub in March 2004, during which he said that the BNP was engaged in a “battle for Britain”.

The jury has been told that it is not being asked to pass judgment on the politics of the BNP or of the defendants, but to decide whether the speeches went so far “beyond robust comment” that they revealed an intent to stir up racial hatred. Mr Griffin, of Llanerfyl, Wales, denies two counts of using words or behaviour intending to stir up racial hatred and two alternative charges of using words or behaviour likely to stir up racial hatred. Mr Collett, of Rothley, Leicestershire, denies four counts of the first offence and four of the alternative charge.

** Seems that if the authoritys wanted to arrange a trial for the BNP that could not have chosen a worse time. First off we have Abu Hamza on trial at the moment over his street rants against the "kafir"/jews and just about anyone whos not a paid up member of the taliban or some other jihadist islamonazi party. Oh and who could forget that other fat fuck Omar "camel abuser" Bakri the ranting cleric and dole scrounger who should also be on trial for crimes like his buddy Abu; then we have a tape by our ol friend Osama who may or may not be alive depending on who you believe, banging on about jihad and the evils of the west again.

The problem is the BNP trial is a show trial, and show trials never work in the long term and unless this government tackles the problem of integrating populations who have lived in their own ghettos for the last forty years plus then the divide between the asian and white populations is only going to grow...source

**Update on the Hamza trial, seems that in his case its not hate speech and incitement to murder according to the defense as it all comes straight from the Koran: Source its ok to call the UK a toilet and spout hate as thats the word of god.

The defence QC Edward Fitzgerald said "It is said he was preaching murder, but he was actually preaching from the Koran itself." ** Well guess that makes it all ok then, set him free to kill us all as after all god said its ok to butcher Kafir.

.