Before I say that can I just say that can we really trust a man who cannot colour coordinate his hair and eyebrows.

Yes Alistair Darling, our later day Squealer from New Labour's very own 1984 had his first and most likely last budget, he looked shifty, twitched and lacks hair/eyebrow coordiation.

And no I shall not stoop to asking what colour Squealers pubes are. Although if any MP's have stood next to him whist in the urinals in the House, could they answer that question...

Anyway the The Devils Kitchen

Blah... stability... blah blah... lie... another lie... none of this is our fault, it's the Tories wot done it... blah... introduce EU target and pretend that it was my idea... blah... lie... more lies... more stability... miss out some crucial lists about the shitness of our economy... blah... still the Tories' fault.

Further, another lie... waffle about trade but no mention that it is an EU competence... blah... lie... more tax on booze and cigarettes... blah... wank, toss... badger-baiting banned... waffle... lie... blah... I'm a fucking tossrag... since we've screwed over pensioners, we'll lob some more fuel money at them... blah... lie... utterly unrealistic projection... waffle... stumble... wank.

Lie, wank, environmental tosss... yet more crap about the lastest "science" though no mention of the Manhattan Declaration... blah... lie... justification for mor tax... wank... lie... yet another EU target masquerading as my idea... lie... another lie... crap... fucking over drivers... balls... careful avoidance of embarrassing figures... an egregious and outright lie... lie... wank... waffle... shit...

.

The licence tax funded BBC has a new project.

Oh and we are paying for it.

But over to El-Beeb:

• It will distinguish itself from other state-funded channels by reporting "without fear or favour", BBC World Service director Nigel Chapman said.

Really! Wow I am impressed.

• This is the BBC's second attempt at an Arabic channel. The first closed in 1996 in the wake of an editorial dispute with its Saudi funders.

Great and we get to see it here back in ol Blighty?

• The channel enters a crowded market, dominated by the Qatar-based al-Jazeera and the Saudi-funded al-Arabiya channels.

Guess not then as they are privately run channels rather than Uk based propaganda channels funded by the hard put upon taxpayers.

• Recent TV channels financed by Western governments have struggled to make an impact, including the US-backed al-Hurra channel in Iraq and France 24 in Arabic.

But that won't stop the BBC thanks to hand outs from the taxpayers here in the land of the dhimmi.

• The service is the BBC's first publicly-funded international TV service.
• It has an annual budget of US $50m (UK £25m). This comes partly from a UK government grant, and partly from BBC World Service

Bet that makes you feel good as you have to pay out £135 per year, knowing that the BBC can piss you tax money away giving free tv to Arabic terrorists.

Lets close down the BBC I say, Inshalla and all that.

Oh, and no chance that the BBC will be revealing the anti-Israel Balen report that shows, or rather would show as we are not allowed to see it as the BBC went to court spending taxpayers money on the case to cover up the fact that the BBC is run by Jew hating anti-semites.

.

Realizing they are in a fix, that the dream of a socialist utopia filled with endless hoards of migrants has not gone down well with the natives, New Labour have started to panic. They have seen the BNP rise and in each and every election(both national & local) the Labour share of the vote shrink.

Both seats in my area(Newport) returned Labour MP's but with reduced majorities.

So having knocked every aspect of this nation, what could be termed "Britishness" for the last 10 years, now think are in the believe that they can claim it back. They are arrogant enough to believe they can rebuild it with a few citizenship lessons, a spot of token flag waving and some re-jigging of the national curriculum along with some classic New Labour spin in the media.

Sadly - for them - they will find that destruction is easier than construction.

So here is there idea link :

School-leavers should be encouraged to swear an oath of allegiance to Queen and country, says a report commissioned by Gordon Brown on British citizenship. Report author, ex-attorney general Lord Goldsmith, says it would give teenagers a sense of belonging. Council tax and student fee rebates are suggested for people who volunteer - as well as a "Britishness" public holiday.

Oh where to begin, it was the chattering Labour MP's(plus media lovies in The Guardian etc) who have lambasted our state institutions. It was them who blamed all of the worlds various assorted faults and ills on our imperial past. It was them who blamed us for the slave trade - forgetting the fact that we were the first imperial power to ban slavery in our empire and also forgetting the role that moslems/Africans had and still have in the slave trade. It was them who ran down over the last ten years the value of our history. It was them who opened up our nation to countless people from alien cultures not foreseeing the problems that would result - then who blamed the natives for any problems. It was them who devalued our institutions - the House of Lords as an example - and said that we should be no longer "little Englanders" but happy euro citizens in the huge socialist fuck up that is the EU.

They hate to their core the values of free choice, free expression, freedom from the state - the very values that are 100% against New Labour national socialist ideology. They will find that trying to get people to wave the flag, will also have those same people re-discovering their attempts to stifle the very aspects that they now promote.

I look forward to the fun of seeing New Labour attempt to spin that.

They argue we need a Britishness Day! We need to swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen, to sing the national anthem, to wave the flag etc etc to allow a tear to slide down our cheeks as we contemplate our great and glorious one eye'd leader.

Oh and it has been done before and look at the trouble this caused....maybe not the most pc reference but well they are all socialists...

.

And it features New Labour's very own Piers Fletcher-Dervish, the dim Ed Balls.

They get driven 150 yards, whilst the rest of us get told they they may remove health care from the NHS should we not be healthy enough!

Two Cabinet ministers used their chauffeur-driven cars to travel 150 yards to a dinner party for Labour donors.

Schools Secretary Ed Balls and Northern Ireland Secretary Shaun Woodward were both driven in their ministerial cars from Downing Street to a Whitehall hotel.

Their chauffeurs stayed outside while they attended the fundraising event and then drove them - separately - to the House of Commons, 300 yards away.

Justine Greening, the Tory MP for Putney, has written Cabinet secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell - the country's most senior civil servant - asking whether the pair have broken the ministerial code.

This states that ministers should always make "efficient and cost-effective" travel arrangements.

A spokesman for Mr Balls said: "The Secretary of State was using the official car because he was expecting to have to vote and was working on official documents."

Chauffeur-driven cars for ministers cost taxpayers around £ 7million a year.

Matthew Elliott, the chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "This is a ridiculous waste of money. Politicians should not be using our money to live the high life - why can't they walk like normal people?"

**because as George Orwell stated in the New Labour policy guidebook 1984, some animals are more equal than others...Besides they honestly believe that a/ they are more important than us little people and b/ see no reason why normal rules should apply to them in any way what so ever.

As I stated before: Ed Balls is a sure sign that some gene pools have been allowed to stagnate and interbreed far to much.

A chinless New Labour wonder that shows that in some parts of the country inbreeding is still a major lifestyle choice.

Oh and on top of his wage he blagged £157,076 in expenses. Not bad for what is a walking hatstand.

Still this is Ed Balls an education minister so dim he can not remember the order of colours in a rainbow:From the BBC

Tag: Ed Balls
Piers Fletcher-Dervish
New Labour

.

Badger haired Chancellor Alistair Darling hit the working folk of the UK again, with the 4p on a pint rise. Playing to the tabloids and puritans in the New Labour party he has delivered a charter for cheap imported larger smuggled in and supermarket drinking.

Remember this when your local pub shuts up shop for the last time and use your vote to kick out the New Labour puritans who desire nothing more than taxing beer and wine out of the workers hands.

From the CAMRA site:http://www.camra.org.uk/page.aspx?o=whatsnew1

Four penny tax increase will do nothing to curb binge drinking but will hit poorest the hardest

The Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) has hit out at the Chancellor's decision to increase beer duty by 4 pence a pint in today's Budget, together with annual increases of 2% above inflation for the next four years. The consumer group claims that the increase will lead to at least 20 pence on a pint over the bar, fuelling pub closures and increasing unregulated drinking as more choose to drink at home or on the streets. This is the first time ever that beer tax has increased by 4 pence - a rise of 13%!

CAMRA recently announced that 57 pubs are lost permanently every month as the price differential between pubs and supermarkets widens. Pubs provide a regulated environment for people to enjoy alcohol socially and responsibly.

Mike Benner, Chief Executive of CAMRA said, “The Chancellor has failed to recognise that well-run community pubs are the solution to Britain's binge drinking problems. This budget will do nothing to stop binge drinking, but it will lead to pub closures on a huge scale, widen the gap between supermarket and pub prices and encourage smuggling and cross-border shopping. It's a great big nail whacked ruthlessly into the coffin of the British pub.”

CAMRA's Media Budget Hotline: 01727 798443

Prices Survey 2008 Results (XLS)
Prices Survey 2008 Results (PDF)
Download Beer Tax Campaign Summary

From The Morning Advertiser

Chancellor Alistair Darling has dropped a budget bombshell by unveiling a swingeing 4p rise in duty on a pint of beer and pledged to raise duty on alcohol by 2% above inflation for the next four years.

This year, Darling has increased alcohol duty by 6% above the rate of Inflation.

The move will add up 12p to 15p to a pint of beer and ensure beer prices rise by well above inflation for the foreseeable future.

Recent wholesale beer price increases from brewers mean the average print will have jumped in price by 25p since the start of the year. Cider is also up by 3p a litre. Duty on a bottle of wine will increase by 14p and 55p will be added to bottle of spirits. Darling said that the average price of a bottle of wine in the supermarket had dropped since 1997 from £4.45 to £4.

Rob Hayward, British Beer & Pub Association (BBPA) chief executive, said: "Government is punishing all beer drinkers rather than tackling the minority of drunken hooligans. But Government tax policy is fuelling Britain¹s binge drink problem by driving people away from beer, out of the pub into the arms of the deep discounting supermarkets."

"They don't pay beer duty and don't allow brewers to pass it on, so their rock bottom prices will remain unaffected by this tax hike." He added: "The millions of people who enjoy beer have just been hit by a £50.5 million a month tax raid on their family budgets."

By aiming a tax hike at beer, the Chancellor is shooting himself in the foot. Treasury revenues will continue to fall, pubs will continue to close and beer sales sink further.

Every single day, the Treasury is losing over £1 million in beer taxes and four pubs are closing.

People are now drinking 1 million fewer pints a day compared with last year. That trend will continue.

"It¹s a decision doomed to failure ­ bad for taxpayers, beer, pubs and bad for the Treasury as well." Opposition leader David Cameron said his party would have targeted duty increases to decrease binge-drinking.

John Ellis of the Crown Inn, a freehold wet-only pub in Oakengates, Shropshire, said: "It's a binge drinkers budget, he rattled through it very fast and all he could talk about was the price of wine in supermarkets - they're going to punish responsible drinkers. Supermarkets will continue to sell at below cost price despite this measure - it's the on-trade, which provides a safe and responsible drinking atmosphere, that's going to be hit. The government is promoting unsupervised drinking, it¹s as simple as that. Every facet of the trade needs to come together and fight or this is the beginning of the end for the British pub."

**They tax for our health(so they claim), they tax for green reasons(so they claim), they tax for no other reason than they can see no other way of running the economy than ever spiraling taxes...

We have 4p a on pint, wine up by 14p a bottle and spirits up by a whacking great 55p. Darling may be the mouthpiece but that was delivered to us by that Calvinistic dour Scottish cunt Gordon "cyclops" Brown.

These puritanical New Labour bastards would tax you taking a shit if they thought they could get away with it...

.

Strange the BBC failed to mention this?

Then again as the BBC is dependent on government good will in order to survive and is publicly funded maybe it is not such a surprise...

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=22866

"Global warming" is not a global crisis

We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;

Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed 'consensus' among climate experts are false;

Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing, human suffering;

Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:

Hereby declare:

That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity's real and serious problems.

That there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change.

That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individual citizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.

That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.

That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.

Now, therefore, we recommend --

That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as "An Inconvenient Truth."

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

Agreed at New York, 4 March 2008

.

Our former Deputy PM John Prescott according to this article is off to Armenia to defuse political crisis.

Definately one for the you could not make it up section.

Yes former cruise ship waiter John who's last recorded expenses was the princely sum of £124,696, is being sent to help keep the peace. But as we all know John has been featured in the news for his peace work before: Video of John Prescott's previous peace mission.

The same moral crusader who kept an affair going with an aide for years behind his wifes back, and when she broke the story it was her who was fired for breaking civil service rules.

That said John has a small cock, some 2" by all accounts in The Sun: That story from The Sun again, and its 5.08 centimeters(for europeans out there)

So Armenia has problems and who blags the job of "helping" them? Fat amoral sewer rat Prescott, a repulsive woman hassler, a dishonest bloke-lets be fair if he lies to his good lady wife for years- he has some practice at being shifty.

Armenia has my thoughts, good luck to them, they will need it!

The story of St Prescott waddling to the rescue.

John Prescott is heading European human rights delegation to Armenia in an attempt to defuse the country's growing political crisis.

The Hull East MP's two-day trip starts tomorrow at the request of the president of the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly.

In a statement, the Council of Europe said Mr Prescott would "assess the post-electoral situation" in Armenia and "explore possibilities for defusing the current political crisis and promoting dialogue".

Mr Prescott was the head of an official observer team monitoring the Armenian presidential elections in February.

Last weekend a state of emergency was declared after a wave of violence swept the country.

Go on slap John Prescott

.

A Labour MP was forced to resign when his wife and daughter were caught using a rail pass for his use only.

Mr Mardy Jones broke the rules by sending two tickets to his wife and daughter.

They boarded a steam train at Pontypridd but were confronted by ticket inspectors, who discovered that one of the tickets was six weeks out of date.

Mr Mardy Jones confessed that the family were short of cash. MPs were paid only £360 a year then.

Charges were pressed and the MP resigned his seat a day before the case was due to come to court. Parris and Maguire report that he pleaded guilty to transferring two non-transferable tickets to his wife and helping her to travel without paying a fare.

Mr and Mrs Mardy Jones were fined £2 each at Marylebone Court. He was ordered to pay £31 10s in costs or face 42 days in jail.

The magistrate, Hay Halkett, told reporters at the court: "It is rather disgraceful to find an MP involved in a case like this.

"However disgusting this case is, and I think it is very disgusting, we have to remember that Mr Mardy Jones has risen to his present position from a coal mine."

**This happened in 1930, when MP's still had a small amount of decency about them. These days short of getting caught flagrante delicio in a child porn scandal an MP would see no reason for resigning.

Hell if it was a Labour MP you could bet the spin machine would be at work doing damage limitation and he would come back into the party after some "therapy"

Cosider this modern day story of David Blunkett MP, scribbler for the The Sun and chap on the board of a company bidding for software for ID cards - no wonder he likes them!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/nov/02/davidblunkett.politics

.

The below MP's did something right:

Ancram, rh Mr. Michael
Bacon, Mr. Richard
Binley, Mr. Brian
Butterfill, Sir John
Campbell, Mr. Gregory
Carswell, Mr. Douglas
Cash, Mr. William
Chope, Mr. Christopher
Conway, Derek
Davies, Mr. Dai
Davies, David T.C.
Davies, Philip
Dodds, Mr. Nigel
Duncan Smith, rh Mr. Iain
Dunne, Mr. Philip
Evans, Mr. Nigel
Fraser, Christopher
Gale, Mr. Roger
Gray, Mr. James
Heathcoat-Amory, rh Mr. David
Hogg, rh Mr. Douglas
Holloway, Mr. Adam
Jenkin, Mr. Bernard
Knight, rh Mr. Greg
Leigh, Mr. Edward
Lilley, rh Mr. Peter
Main, Anne
Malins, Mr. Humfrey
McCrea, Dr. William
Pritchard, Mark
Redwood, rh Mr. John
Robinson, rh Mr. Peter
Scott, Mr. Lee
Shepherd, Mr. Richard
Simpson, David
Spink, Bob
Stuart, Mr. Graham
Tapsell, Sir Peter
Taylor, Dr. Richard
Turner, Mr. Andrew
Walker, Mr. Charles
Whittingdale, Mr. John
Widdecombe, rh Miss Ann
Wilshire, Mr. David
Wilson, Sammy
Winterton, Ann
Winterton, Sir Nicholas

Tellers:
Mr. Peter Bone
Mr. Philip Hollobone

These are the 49 MPs who supported the "new Clause 9" - "Notwithstanding any provision of the European Communities Act 1972, nothing in this Act shall affect or be construed by any court in the UK as affecting the supremacy of Parliament"

However Mike Hancock who voted for and against the motion, which says that either he was "tired and emotional" having spent some time in the Common's bar? Or he is trying to please everyone and just managing to make himself look a complete fucking tit into the bargain.

As for Gordon he is holding out for the EU to take over the running of our nation in all real terms, reducing the powers of his job to that of a mere Tetrarch over the UK people.

Brown once stated at Prime Minister's Question Time: 'The message should go out today very clearly that decisions in this country are made in this House and not on the roof of this House.' - Alas as Mr Brown knows all to well and it would have been far more honest of him to admit that, they are made abroad and just rubber stamped in the House.

As for the rest of our 600 MP's who either were not there, or voted against this and are looking forward to getting crumbs off the Imperial table in the EU, they are just complete and utter cunts of the first order.

Hat Tip to Not A Sheep

.

One has to wonder about the moral perspective of the ruling New Labour government here in the UK. One the one hand they are happy to allow in such morally enlightened people as Yusuf al Qaradawi.

A man who and I quote the BBC here: "has distanced himself from suicide attacks in the West but he has consistently defended Palestinian suicide attacks against Israelis."

So there you go, killing Jews = self defense, anyone else and its murder and yet he is allowed into the UK.

Whilst at the same time they also are refusing to ban the abhorrent Hizb ut-Tahrir, which also spout hate against the west and also against Jews and the state of Israel.

Yet our dire Home Sec. Jacqui Smith a woman totally removed from the very people see represents has chosen to ban from our fair Isles the deputy leader of Israel’s centre-right Likud party, Moshe Feiglin.

And he has been informed of his exclusion even though he had no plans to visit the UK.

The best irony is - although this will be lost on Ms Smith who is not the sharpest pencil in the box - that she used powers invoked after the July 2005 London bombings. Those were bombings by - home grown - moslem terrorists.

The following is from The Jewish Cronicle

In a two-page letter sent to Mr Feiglin’s office in Ginot Shomron, an unnamed Border and Immigration Agency official, writing on Ms Smith’s behalf, cited articles written by Mr Feiglin and said she had “personally directed” that he be banned.

The letter said: “It is considered that you are seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred which might lead to inter-community violence in the UK.

“In light of these factors, the Home Secretary is satisfied you should be excluded from the UK on the grounds that your exclusion is conducive to the public good.” There is no right of appeal.

The Home Office would say nothing more about why or how the decision was made, other than to say that Ms Smith can exclude people whether or not they have applied to come to Britain. But it does take into account relevant information supplied by other government departments and agencies.

Mr Feiglin said: “This is a British government problem, not mine. However, if somebody in Britain feels comfortable enough to do something like that, it should turn on some serious red lights in any British citizen who cares about democracy. Britain and America are letting in the real terrorists — remember [Iranian] President Ahmadinejad was allowed to speak at an American university.”

In a swipe at the government’s refusal to exclude Ibrahim Mousawi, the editor of a Hizbollah journal who has been in Britain on a speaking tour, Mr Feiglin went on: “I almost feel honoured, because of the way that the British government is behaving, to be marked as the bad guy by a government that supports terror. I see it almost as a compliment.”

He has visited Britain once before, 15 years ago, when he entered and left without hindrance.

Mr Feiglin said the letter “came out of the blue”. He considered it might be a clever forgery perpetrated by political opponents. He was not surprised when told by the JC that it was genuine.

“This is all very strange because I have no plans to visit Britain either in the short or long term. I have never been banned from anywhere else. In fact I am giving a lecture in Canada at the end of this month,” he said.

How sad that this nation now lacks the balls to refer to terrorism as terrorism, we see it referred to by govt figures as anti-Islamic activity despite the fact that this jihadist terror, is aimed at non moslems and Jews in particular as the recent celebrations by Palestinians over the shooting in Israel show all to well.

The reason Israel has so many problems with large numbers of moslems wanting to destroy them and throwing a party each time some mad lunatic kills a number of them is this, because Mohammed their prophet said so

He commanded his followers to: "kill Jews wherever you find them."

Could not be any fucking clearer, well unless you happen to be our dim Home Sec. Jacqui Smith that is.

Anyway back to her reasons for Ms Smiths deciding to bar a chap who had no plans on coming to the UK, as detailed in part in this letter:

The Home Secretary notes that you have made the following statements:

“In order to declare that we are right, we have to declare war. War now! It’s not the Arabs who are murdering mothers, but those merciful people who gave weapons to the murderers. It’s not the Arabs who are burning babies, but the peaceniks that recognised the justice of the Arabs cause. It’s not the cruel people who are bombing us, but the merciful people who showed them mercy. War now! A holy war, now”

– “War Now” article by you, quoted on Channel 7 Israel National website

“The Christian world is faced with two options: it can fight against terror, which means fighting against Islam, or it can surrender and be gradually overcome by the waves of the modern Moslem Jihad… Arabs are not sons of the desert but its father. They created the desert — everywhere they come vegetation stops and the wind blows everything away”

**Again I refer to the comment above about wanting the Jews dead, as well as inumerable comments by so many moslem clerics/writers/scholars who rant on about jihad aginst the Jews/The West/America etc.

— Extract from an article by you quoted on the “Israel Science and Technology Homepage”

“The basis of Islam is not the quality of mercy but of justice. If Christianity bridges the gap between sin and morals by automatic benevolence and absolution (that over long periods were sold by clergy), Islam does this in a far simpler way — it abolishes both benevolence and morals… Their holy Muhammed is strong, cruel and deceitful.”

In expressing such views, it is considered that you are seeking to provoke others to serious criminal acts and fostering hatred which might lead to inter-community violence in the UK.

The Home Secretary considers that should you be allowed to enter the UK, you would continue to espouse such views, which would not be conducive to the public good in the UK.Under New Labour they have allowed this sort of thuggery(above) to be on our streets. Now that for the benefit of Ms Smith is how moslem terrorists thing of our values and freedoms. One can but assume that Ms Smith thinks this activity is conductive to public good?Again another prime example for Ms Smith. You see it right there, freedom go to hell. Could not be any clearer, yet far easier to blame the Jews rather than moslem terrorists.
I shall say this and this is aimed at every Jew hating socialist like Jacqui Smith etc, out there in the National Socialist New Labour Party:

Over the last 11 years of your rule, you have opened the doors to terrorism both native and imported.

Your playing of liberalism has removed any moral ground, whilst at the same time the left and New Labour have gloried in beating Israel at every chance, yet say little if anything over Islamist comments about killing of Jews.

It has gone from a nation where free speech and free views are valued to an oppressive, dictatorial anti liberty, pro islamist shithole.

Time and time again New Labour have allowed in terrorists and their supporters, giving them air-time, meetings with MP's, media coverage and lack of condemnation for their words promoting the slaughter of innocents.

Only the other day did we see Palestinians celebrating in the murder of students gunned down on the BBC news, yet not a peep was uttered by this party, this government or its agencies condemning the Palestinians for glorying in the deaths of Jews.

So spineless are our socialist leaders that they would do nothing should Israel be attacked again. Except maybe protest should Israel dare to defend itself.

Of all the many, many things this amoral party has done, this has to be the lowest.

So on the part of New Labour Jew haters- who lack the moral integrity to apologize - I do it for them.

I just hope that the world doesn't judge this nation by the gutless anti-semitic shits who rule us, the rest of the population of the UK can see the difference between Islamic terrorism and the slaughter of children at Beslan, destruction of 9/11, 7/7, Bali etc etc etc, and the state of Israel fighting for survival against jihadist baby killers.

Maybe Ms Smith should content herself to keeping quite and the next time she is tempted to open her mouth, please fill it with a Kebab

.

Kurt Westergaard has made a new drawing about his feelings over the newest row over the Motoons, with his own comments in both Danish and English.

Why have we never had any real apology from the moslem hoards over the slaughter of Belsan amongst so many others...

.

Thanks to "Glorious Leader" comrade Brown and the other communists of New Labour.

Famine, no freedom, free speech oppressed, North Korea today and soon to be here in the UK under Brown's glorious one eye'd leadership...

.

So Margaret Hodge thinks that the proms are inclusive enough. This from our Culture Sec. who like many lefties hates anything that promotes old fashioned values of the UK, over the multi cultural shambles they have created after 11 years.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7276684.stm

The Proms attract too narrow a section of society, culture minister Margaret Hodge has suggested in a speech.

She praised "icons of a common culture" from Coronation Street to the Angel of the North and said culture could "enhance a sense of shared identity".

But the Proms was one of several major cultural events many people did not feel comfortable attending, she said.

Well that's her problem, maybe she would be happier with some ethnic steel bands attending. Then again this is the vile woman who was accused of ignoring child abuse when she was head of Islington council.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3270149.stm

Children's Minister Margaret Hodge has said sorry to the sex abuse victim she branded "extremely disturbed".

Mrs Hodge said she would like to "apologise unreservedly" to Demetrious Panton for the description.

She had made the remarks in a letter of complaint to the BBC about an inquiry into a child abuse scandal in London's Islington where she was council leader.

But Mr Panton said Mrs Hodge should "do the decent thing" and resign. The Conservatives also said she should go....

"I wish you all the best for the future and am genuinely sorry to have contributed to your suffering," the minister added.

Mrs Hodge led Islington Council from 1982 to 1992, when it emerged that children in the council's care had been abused.

She has been accused of failing to act, despite receiving warnings - an allegation she denies.

An amoral pc whore then and the same now. A typical example of communist New Labour party members in action.

.

The government are attempting to peddle the ID cards through a "soft sell" route. According to Sky News, dire Home Sec. Jacqui Smith is trying to soft sell us the idea of ID cards.

The indications are that she will try a new approach to convincing the public to support the proposals.

Forget the 'hard sell' - it looks like the Home Office is trying the 'soft soap' instead.

A source who has seen a draft of the speech has described the tone as "conciliatory".

Instead of government ministers and police officers talking tough and insisting they need Britons to carry ID cards to beat terrorism, the emphasis will shift to persuading people they be missing out if they fail to sign up to the scheme.

Thanks all the same but every instinct tells me that you and the rest of this government - unable to keep our information safe - are not to be trusted, so I will pass if it's all the same.

"Entitlement" seems to be the buzzword and the card is being portrayed as the way to access state benefits and public services.

The timetable for implementing the cards is much clearer too.

So lets get this right, their arguement is that we need to pay for an ID card to access services that I am already entitled to and have already paid for through my taxes over the years! An of course when people start using the cards you can bet that every agency will start brow beating its "customers" - thats me and you, to start using the ID Card to speed up the process.

Despite the fact that both a driving license and UK passport are fine for dealing with the private sector, both are photo ID and both suitable for 99.9% of agencies and private companies.

The UK Libertarian Party's Leader, Patrick Vessey said:

“Both ID cards and the accompanying database fundamentally change the relationship between individuals and the state.

“The Libertarian Party is utterly opposed to this cataloguing of the people of Britain.

“In a truly free society, and provided that they harm nobody else by doing so, every person should be able to go where they like, and call themselves what they like, without having to beg permission of anyone else.

“Instead, the Labour government feels justified in tagging and labelling us as though we were mere livestock—bovine automata to be herded and tracked at our masters' convenience.”

Livestock, the perfect word for how the communists of New Labour see the UK public.

Another aspect is the shifty fucking dealings by a former cabinet minister and former Home Sec. David Blunkett who keeps very quiet about how he has since last March been chairman of the international advisory committee of Entrust Inc, the Texas based security company which hopes to provide software for the UK ID cards system.

Why so quiet about that one? He bangs on about how an ID Card would make us all safe from moslem terrorists under the bed, despite the fact that his own government lets in radical clerics and has failed to enforce controls on inward migration.

Then claims that if we were all on the DNA database, that we would all be safer from criminals. This from his government that jails OAP's for failing to pay council tax and yet lets out serious criminals early. I fact if they go to Pencoed Open Prison just up the road from me they can - and do - walk out the front door!

Yet not a word about vested interests for Mr David Blunkett.

So thanks all the same but New Labour can stick their ID Cards up their arse. Not compulsory, well unless you want to do any of this lot:

• Travel
• Get a bank account
• Get a loan
• Prove who we are to the police
  
• Buy property

.

Denmark's security services have provided protection to namesakes of the Danish cartoonist behind controversial cartoons of Mohammed.

There are 82 Kurt Westergaards living in Denmark but only one of them is the man who life is under daily threat because of his caricatures of the founder of Islam.

However, some of other 81 "Kurts" scattered across Denmark have also received mistaken identity death threats because they share the same name as the illustrator.

One, a businessman from the Danish town of Aabenraa, has been offered protection by Denmark's intelligence agency, the PET, after receiving multiple death threats.

"The worst thing was that they also called my three children. They wanted to kidnap my family and murder me," he said.

Three weeks ago police arrested three men for conspiracy to murder the real Kurt Westergaard. He joked to media yesterday that "at least it takes some of the immense pressure off of me".

"As one of my friends put it, it's too bad for the Kurts," he said.

Cartoon caricatures of Islam's founding Prophet Mohammed were published in Danish newspapers two years ago triggering Muslim riots and violence which claimed the lives of over 50 people.

The recent reprinting of images in the Danish media, including one by Mr Westergaard of Mohammed wearing a turban concealing a bomb, have given rise to a new round protests and death threats.

Consider the number of moslems called Mohammed(and assorted spellings thereof) and you would think that maybe, just maybe they would think that there might be more than one Mr Westergaard in the country.

Still I guess that is what our dire Home Sec. Jacqui Smith would refer to as "anti-Islamic activity" - although strange how all this renamed terrorist hate is aimed at us infidels?

Hate e-mails from people called Mohammed(and various spellings thereof) to the usual e-mail address, thanks.

.

They(Labour) said on their election manifesto that we would be getting a chance to vote on Europe, then they changed their minds.

They decided that the treaty was different, so we plebs deserve not a voice.

Tonight the MP's voted not to give the public a referendum on Europe.

MPs reject EU treaty referendum.

We have had by that decision not to allow a vote, these MP's agreeing to our being a vassal state, subject to the will of the EU in most matters. Keeping only token powers for ourselves and to appease the mob, so our politicians can argue that we are a free nation.

Despite the fact that over 70% of our laws come via the EU these days, yet we here not a word on lowering the wages of our MP's by 70% to match the work outsourced to Europe.

Like vassal kingdoms of the past, the local power will pretend to be an independent state - sure we can raise our own taxes - but with regards the big decisions on policy, world view and our world voice- growing smaller by the day; all of that will be done by Europe.

Brown and co will be quite happy when thrown out to grovel at their masters feet like King Herod the Great groveled before Rome for scraps from the Republics table.

Hell maybe the EU will give him some office overseeing UK affairs from Brussels after awarding Mr Gordon Brown the title of Tetrarch over the UK.

As for the mob, most of them show more interest in Big Brother on TV, the latter day "bread and circuses" than for our political freedom as a nation.

Brown once stated at Prime Minister's Question Time: 'The message should go out today very clearly that decisions in this country are made in this House and not on the roof of this House.' - Alas as Mr Brown knows all to well and it would have been far more honest of him to admit that, they are made abroad and just rubber stamped in the House.

The more things change the more we see history repeat itself...

.

Ten years of socialist rule have made a complete mess of the UK's finances.

Exactly ten years ago the FTSE 100 stood at 5,782. Last night the stock market closed at 5,767. Investors have seen the stock market and the value of their pensions decline during the ten years of New Labour's economic management under Gordon Brown.

By comparison the Dow was at 8,569 on March 6, 1998 and last night it closed at 12,213.

Remember that next time Gordon or Alastair claim that "Britain is stronger placed to weather the coming global financial turbulence"

.

Illegal immigrants are bypassing supposedly foolproof border controls by simply climbing over a fence at Calais.

The farcical discovery was made by Peers during a visit to the French port - where migrants assemble to try to sneak into the UK by lorry.

The House of Lords committee said inadequate fencing at Calais was allowing "determined" illegals to get into a "clean" lorry park - where vehicles have already undegone checks involving heartbeat and breath sensors and scanners which can see through vehicles.

Last year 1,300 were found in the parking area, but critics say thousands more are likely to have made it to the UK.

More than 800,000 vehicles pass through Calais each year.

It is hugely embarrassing for the Home Office, which has spent millions providing hi-tech scanning equipment in Calais and other European ports.

The heartbeat sensors, CO2 probes and "passive millimetre wave" scanners which can see through vehicles have all been provided at the UK taxpayer's expense. The equipment has been operating at Calais since October 2004.

Once these checks have been cleared, lorries park near the ferry berths and the House of Lords EU Committee on Home Affairs noticed the inadequate fencing.

The chairman of the committee, Lord Jopling, said: "Our visit to the juxtaposed British and French border controls at Calais showed that there are excellent new technologies deployed to prevent illegal migration to the UK.

"However, we were surprised to find inadequate fencing, the replacement of which might prevent 1,500 illegal immigrants a year from boarding lorries bound for Britain. This would be entirely in British interests.

**Another day, another mess in New Labour's Cool Britannia. Unable to keep even the pretense of a secure nation, whilst they fiddle expense in Westminster the hoards of unwashed, uncivilized barbarians head into the UK bringing crime and disease with them.

.

Quite what country is it that we are living in? Cuba? The former USSR? Well some in the New Labour government seem to be having wet dreams about getting us heading that way.

An so here is the rather telling remark by Home Office Minister Megg Hillier in front of a parliamentary committee last week.

"You should see an ID card like a passport in-country."

The day of us "free citizens" here in the UK having to show our papers to the police, government officials and anyone - in order to get anything done - are creeping ever nearer.

For those who can't see what the problem may be, let me clarify what an internal passport is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_passport

Internal passports were used in the Soviet Union for identification of persons for various purposes. In particular, passports were used to control and monitor the place of residence by means of propiska, a regulation in the Soviet Union designed to control internal population movement by binding a person to his or her permanent place of residence. Officially, propiska was introduced for statistical reasons: since in the planned economy of the Soviet Union the distribution of goods and services was centralized, the overall distribution of population was to be monitored. For example, a valid propiska was necessary to receive higher education or medical treatment. Also, since there was no private ownership of real estate, having a propiska for an address meant that you had the right to live there.

The context was her saying that 80% of people already have a passport, and she immediately qualified it by saying that ID cards weren't "entitlement cards" merely "an easier way to access services" - but, that is just a very small step to take.

A step the New Labour communists will take, for security reasons if for no other reason. A first it will be over zealous officials demanding them as ID, then they will be the only acceptable form of ID.

.

I said that she would do this over her remarks with regards 9/11. In my previous post on French asshat Marion Cotillard I said:

Yet another US moonbat, who when she realises that this has truly fucked her chances in Hollywood will do the celeb thing of backtracking and claiming she was misquoted along with the usual therapy bullshit.

And so we now have this from Marion Cotillard, we now see spin going into action...

The 32-year-old actress, who last month scooped numerous best actress awards including a BAFTA for her portrayal of Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose, had said that the US regularly lied about major events, up to and including the terrorist attacks on New York.

But, faced with losing millions as the notoriously patriotic Hollywood film industry reacted against her vitriol, Cotillard claimed there had been a misunderstanding.

Her Paris-based lawyer Vincent Tolesano said: "Marion never intended to contest nor question the attacks of September 11, 2001, and regrets the way old remarks have been taken out of context."

The apology coincided with Cotillard preparing to fly to Chicago next week to start filming Public Enemies with Johnny Depp - a movie that was set to become the first big money spinner for the previously unknown actresses .

In fact Cotillard, a green activist for Greenpeace, had used an interview with the French channel Paris Première to make her views abundantly clear.

Speaking on the cinema discussion programme Paris Dernière in February 2007, Cotillard had said: "I think we're lied to about a number of things", even claiming the Americans had destroyed the Twin Towers themselves because the were an outdated "money sucker".

Expanding her conspiracy theory, Cotillard said it would been "a lot more expensive" to rebuild the towers "which is why they were destroyed", with the loss of thousands of American lives.

Cotillard, we as we can see is well known for her, er acting ability.

.

If you are going to fuck over the public, then it is best to do so in style. Tom Watson has bent us(by us I refer to the taxpayers of the UK) over the barrel and with no lubricant rogered us all up the arse to the tune of £300,000+

Guido has somethings to say on his fiscal rape of the taxpayers.

Last year Watson pocketed his £60,000 salary and his parliamentary expenses amounted to £150,000-plus – bringing his total package to £211,000 - making him the 73rd highest claiming MP out of 646 MPs. Quite an achievement for an MP not claiming for travel to and from Scotland. He of course employs his wife Siobhan at the public's expense, his brother, Dan, is constituency director to Euro MP Michael Cashman, Dan Watson's wife, Joanna, has no fewer than three jobs. Like her husband, she also works for Mr Cashman and for Wolverhampton Labour MP Pat McFadden, yet still finds time to be a Labour councillor in Sandwell. Amy Watson, cousin of Tom and Dan, works for Birmingham Northfield Labour MP Richard Burden. The West Midlands constituency Labour Party offices are packed with Watsons...

The total annual cost to the taxpayer of the Watson family's five not-so-little piggies is in excess of £300,000. Far more than the disgraced Derek Conway fiddled...

**New Labour, still corrupt, still amoral, still lying, still out for number one, still out to live double standards. Communist fucks back in the 1970's and still communist fucks now.

.

More than fifty MPs have laid off members of their staff recently.

The researchers being dismissed by MPs are largely thought to be family members and the mass exodus suggests that many MPs are unwilling to publicly defend or justify their employment.

It comes amid claims that new disclosure rules are being delayed to allow MPs to clean up their financial affairs.

Does the phrase covering their tracks, leap to mind here....

Still I am rather sure that many stories on this subject will be filling the pages of the press over the next few weeks and months...

This from a government that still ignores the 88% of people who are calling for a referendum on the EU treaty:

Europe Minister Jim Murphy told MPs it was up to Parliament to decide "the right thing to do".

Like lie over expenses paid to family members, like ignore problems with their own standards whilst then selling us out to Europe. An they still wonder why people don't bother to vote.

.

Henry the Hoover has been put to a strange use...

A HOSPITAL builder has been sacked after being caught having sex with a Henry the hoover.

The Polish contractor – who was supposed to be locking up the site – was found naked and on his knees with the smiling cleaner in the staff canteen.

A horrified security guard at Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital told him to “clean himself and the hoover” before kicking him out.

The shameless builder later told bosses he was vacuuming his underwear – “a common practice in Poland”.

His firm were refurbishing admin offices 100 yards from the hospital in central London.

An insider said: “The guard who found him said he was groaning louder than the hoover.”

HG Construction, based in Hitchin, Herts, said: “That behaviour is not acceptable, though it gave a few people a laugh.”

**Still 10/10 for the excuse - hoovering his underwear, right up there with Tony Blair claiming to be an honest sort of bloke and Ron Davies looking for badgers...

.

It seems that the Labour Party is busy soliciting for more funds, and it is the government policy that is for sale, along with consumer rights, democracy and what is left of the nations silverware...

Labour has resumed a secret courtship of influential donors before new funding rules are introduced to cover the party from future sleaze allegations, The Times has learnt.

Labour fears being left behind by the Tories in building up their war chest to fund the next general election. Labour, now £20 million in debt, generated only £580,000 from individual donors in the last quarter of last year, while Tory fundraisers brought in £9.8 million over the same period.

Jon Mendelsohn, Mr Brown’s leading fundraiser, is inviting small businessmen as potential donors to a series of private dinners to mingle with Cabinet ministers. They have been told that they could help to shape the next Labour manifesto...

The reason for the meetings, he wrote, was because “the Government is mid-term and in the process of preparing and planning for the next general election” and would appreciate an opportunity to “discuss ideas and campaign proposals”...

Last Tuesday’s dinner for 16 was held in a private room at Royal Horse-guards Hotel 150 yards from Downing Street. The Labour Party officials included Chris Lennie, the acting general secretary of the party, who hosted the event, and Mr Mendelsohn. Lord Sainsbury, the Party’s most generous ever donor, and Jon Aisbitt, the City hedge fund executive who gave £250,000 last year, were also present.

So need something done and got the money, then have a chat with that nice Mr Brown & for a mere 50K or so he will tip you a nod and a wink.

New Labour, the party of backhanders, sleaze and lies.

.

Mr Holmes MP(Lib Dem) has been quoted as saying about Cuba:

"It is true Cuba has political prisoners and no free elections," said Holmes, "but it has very good dentistry."

So I popped him the following e-mail.

He also signed an EDM(Early Day Motion) which I detail in the mail below and have written about before with regards the other usefull idiots of Fidel who also signed this motion:
Idiots who signed EDM 982

Anyway here is the mail, whats the odds that Lib Dem Holmes decides not to reply?

Dear Mr Holmes,

I noticed that you signed this EDM

EDM 982

FIDEL CASTRO

20.02.2008

Burgon, Colin

That this House commends the achievements of Fidel Castro in securing first-class free healthcare and education provision for the people of Cuba despite the 44 year illegal US embargo of the Cuban economy; notes the great strides Cuba has taken during this period in many fields such as biotechnology and sport in both of which Cuba is a world leader; acknowledges the esteem in which Castro is held by the people and leaders of Africa, Asia and Latin America for leading the calls for emancipation of the world's poorest people from slavery, hunger and the denial of human rights such as the right to life, the right to shelter, the right to healthcare and basic medicines and the right to education; welcomes the EU statement that constructive engagement with Cuba at this time is the most responsible course of action; and calls upon the Government to respect Cuba's right to self-determination and resist the aggressive forces within the US Administration who are openly planning their own illegal transition in Cuba.

Would you offer your support to this dictator if you knew about the case of Normando Hernández González.

Link:http://www.newstatesman.com/200711080021
Plus: http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=6917

Also: http://www.pen.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/912/prmID/174

A jailed Cuban journalist whose health is rapidly deteriorating in the face of prison-contracted diseases has been chosen as one of four writers to mark the Day of the Imprisoned Writer on 15 November. The special day, held on the same date each year, is organised by PEN, the writers' organisation that backs persecuted authors around the world.

Normando Hernández González was imprisoned in 2003 for reports and broadcasts on the internet and Radio Martí that were said by the government to endanger security. Hernández was found guilty of spying and threatening national security, crimes that carry a 25-year jail term. He was one of 75 journalists arrested in the Cuban government crackdown on the press in 2003 and, according to PEN, remains one of 59 still held by the regime.

He was thrown a glimmer of hope a few months ago when the government of Costa Rica effectively granted him asylum in absentia, launching a plea for his release after reports of a downward turn in his condition.

The move came about after Hernández's mother, Bianca González, appealed to Costa Rican legislators to intervene.

José Manuel Echandi, a former Defender of the Citizens in Costa Rica, answered the call and accused Cuba of torture in blocking the journalist's release.

The Cuban journalist's illness has been partly brought about by a hunger strike he began six months ago, but he has also contracted tuberculosis in prison. Hernández has spent most of the past 12 months in a maximum security prison, but was recently moved to a hospital for treatment.

At Echandi's request, Costa Rica asked Cuba to free Hernández and allow him to be transferred across the Caribbean Sea for health care attention in that country. When they received no response, Echandi wrote to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, to seek help to speed his release.

Press freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders is also backing the request that Hernández should be transported to Costa Rica.

"Humanitarian concerns are clearly paramount as regards all prisoners of conscience," the organisation said.

Cuba has more journalists locked up than any other country in the world, apart from China. Those still held since March 2003 are serving sentences ranging from 14 to 27 years.

According to Reporters Without Borders, three journalists held in Cuba were arrested after Fidel Castro's brother Raú took over the running of the country last year.

I also understand that you have been quoted as saying "It is true Cuba has political prisoners and no free elections," said Holmes, "but it has very good dentistry."

Which may well be true, but all that makes yourself Mr Holmes is a useful idiot to a dictator who runs a Soviet style gulag with palm trees.

.

Actress Marion Cotillard sparked a political row yesterday after accusing America of fabricating the 9/11 attacks.

The 32-year-old French actress, who received an Oscar last month for her performance as singer Edith Piaf in La Vie En Rose, openly questioned the truth behind the terrorist atrocity in an interview broadcast on a French website.

"I think we're lied to about a number of things," Cotillard said, singling out the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center as an example of the US making up horror stories for political ends.

Referring to the two passenger jets being flown into the Twin Towers, Cotillard said:

"We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes. Are they burned? They [sic] was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burnt for 24 hours. It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [in New York], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed."

She added that the towers, planned in the early Sixties, were an outdated "money-sucker" that would have cost more to modernise than to rebuild altogether, which is why they were destroyed.

She said: "It was a money-sucker because they were finished, it seems to me, by 1973, and to re-cable all that, to bring up-to-date all the technology and everything, it was a lot more expensive, that work, than destroying them."

Cotillard's stardom and increased earning power looked assured following her Oscar win.

But after her outburst, in which she also queried the 1969 Moon landings, a successful future in Hollywood appears to be in jeopardy.

She said: "Did a man really walk on the Moon? I saw plenty of documentaries on it, and I really wondered. And in any case I don't believe all they tell me, that's for sure."

Cotillard, we as we can see is well known for her, er acting ability.

Cotillard, who was born and brought up in Paris, made the comments on Paris Première - Paris Dernière, a programme broadcast a year ago.

At the time, her remarks were largely ignored, but their appearance yesterday on the French magazine website Marianne2 comes at a time when Cotillard's profile is sky-high.

She is shortly due to fly to Chicago to star alongside Johnny Depp in Public Enemies, a gangster movie expected to be her first big money-spinner.

Cotillard's film career began in Luc Besson's 1998 film Taxi - a huge hit in France but less so around the world.

She is slowly becoming a household name in France, in a list most recently topped by her close friend Audrey Tautou and previously by women such as Catherine Deneuve and Brigitte Bardot.

**Yet another US moonbat, who when she realises that this has truly fucked her chances in Hollywood will do the celeb thing of backtracking and claiming she was misquoted along with the usual therapy bullshit.

Maybe there is some inverse law that states that the stupidity of starlets is in direct proportion to the size of their tits?

.

Quite what is it with certain members of the BMA, they feel that they have to pontificate over each aspect of our lives and dictate from on high on what is best for us.

One of them by the name of Trish Groves now seems to think that the middle classes are getting hammered on a bottle of wine and well we are not grown ups able to make up our own minds but nothing more than sheep who need the guiding hand of the all wise BMA.

Sorry Trish Groves (Deputy Editor of The British Medical Journal) who thinks we are all too stupid and weak to be trusted with a whole bottle of wine, but fuck off.

Go back to doctoring, fixing bones and doling out pills that you and the rest of your ilk get a cushy backhanders for from the drug companies.

She Quotes:

Making half-bottles of wine cheaper and more available could quell the temptation to drink too much, Trish Groves said.

Ah curse that free choice, far better that free choice be taken away from us mere uneducated plebs ay Trish?

But she is not finished spouting shyte just yet:

Ms Groves said that sticking to recommended daily alcohol limits - two small glasses of wine a day for men, and less than that for women - could be a challenge once the cork had been popped on a standard-sized bottle of wine.

"It's all too tempting to finish the bottle there and then to avoid waste," she said.

"Coupled with the news that wine is getting stronger, it's no wonder Britain's middle classes are getting wasted."

Oh what great gems of wisdom we have there. Well couple of points, first off the recommended figures are complete and utter shit. Fag packet maths dreamed up out of nowhere, and here is the proof:link

Guidelines on safe alcohol consumption limits that have shaped health policy in Britain for 20 years were “plucked out of the air” as an “intelligent guess”.

The Times reveals today that the recommended weekly drinking limits of 21 units of alcohol for men and 14 for women, first introduced in 1987 and still in use today, had no firm scientific basis whatsoever.

Subsequent studies found evidence which suggested that the safety limits should be raised, but they were ignored by a succession of health ministers.

Secondly would not the fact that doctors etc are doling out more and more prescription drugs - the figures go up each year - be a more urgent issue to look at? Or would that hit our medical staff in the wallets? Far better to tut from on high at the middle classes for having a glass or four of plonk.

I will advise her lastly of one fact that she has overlooked, bottles of wine come with either a cork/screw top and so people can choose - that cursed free choice again - to leave the demon drink alone. So I advise Trish Groves to put a cork in it forthwith and to kindly fuck off out of our lives.

.