Its been known that the BBC is pro moslem for some time now and this one is a classic. The people who write the BBC show Casualty came up with the idea of a terror attack, but decided that they could not have an attack by moslems after all they would never do such a thing.
They must have worked themselves into knots of guilt over this, they want a terror attack but we can't blame the moslems. They would like to blame the Jews(as per a certain Mr Mel Gibson) but that might start calls for the Balen report to be released so best leave the zionists alone...Ah ha got it they must have thought we can blame the animal rights people.
From the Daily Mail
The BBC has dropped plans to show a fictional terror attack in an episode of Casualty to avoid offending Muslims.
The first show of the hospital drama's new series was to have featured a storyline about an explosion caused by Islamic extremists.
Now the bomb will be set off by animal rights campaigners instead.
A BBC spokesman said: "With any storyline there are lots of ideas that get put forward but don't make the series."
**Casualty is a work of fiction, but that is no excuse for the BBC sinking into its own version of 1984 newspeak.
Another good article cover this and finished with this:
To ban a storyline featuring Islamic terrorists not only misrepresents reality; it is also an insult to licence-payers whose family, friends or colleagues were blown to pieces on July 7 - and not by animal rights activists.
Richard Littlejohn finished his bit on the BBC cowering before Islam and the Prophet with this:I don't like to indulge in gratuitous Beeb-bashing, because there's so much good about the organisation.
But it is too big, too unaccountable and too riddled with an institutionalised mindset which holds that it's fine to heap scorn on Christians and Jews, but cravenly appeases Muslims at every turn.
The BBC is a publicly-funded body which has a duty to be even-handed to all and not pander to the political prejudices of those who work for it.
If it can't manage that, it should be broken up and sold off.
His bit on El-Beeb is here
**If anyone thinks that the BBC has any excuse over its pro moslem, and anti Israel stance then ask them why they the BBC are still refusing to publish the Balen Report, which it commissioned to investigate allegations of anti-Israel bias?
Another review of BBC Casualty: over at NightdragonA little tune on the license tax.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/seb.hunt/
A parody with more than a grain of truth in it:
ttp://www.sodall.co.uk/BBC/parody/index.htm
Tags:BBC Bias
Casualty
BBC
Animal Rights
Balen Report
2 people have spoken:
As a devout Muslim I am outraged by the BBC distracting attention away from Islam by giving credit to Animal Rights Activists for successful jihad operations.
How are we Muslims supposed to intimidate and subdue the Kuffar if they don't know who's bombing them?
And besides that, what will Allah think? When I go for my final journey in my specially designed bombulance (gets to places where no normal vehicle would be allowed and carries enough petrol for a range of 350,000 miles) I want Allah to know I did it for my fellow Muslims, not for a bunch of drugged-up rats.
If Allah watches the BBC, then he could assume I'm an anti-vivisectionist. I could end up spending eternity with 72 guinea-pigs instead of 72 voluptuous nine-year olds.
I normally enjoy working in A & E after a good bomb attack. Performing emergency amputations makes me feel I'm pleasing Allah ("The Kuffar should have their hands and their feet cut off on opposite sides - even if they've been admitted with head injuries" - Koran 5.33). But it really takes the fun away if the Bunny Huggers are going to get the credit for all the maiming and mutilation.
I'm going to write to the West Midlands Police TV Censorship Office to get this nonsense stopped immediately. Credit where credit is due - Muslims are the world's most accomplished terrorists. And we are also wholeheartedly in favour of vivisection - especially of Kuffars.
- Dr C. Riyal Kilah
Muslim Medical Malpractitioners' Association.
May it be so, Inshalla!
Post a Comment